This article depicts a brief analysis of the main aspects of dissenting opinions in the Romanian judicial realms. The research focuses on addressing the dissenting opinion’s definition, the forms under which it can be identified in the national legislation, the causes that generate it, for and against arguments and last but not least, the means for expressing it.

The role of the judge is currently viewed with a certain degree of skepticism by society in general, especially due to the procrastination of judicial disputes brought to trial, but few litigants are aware of the judge’s work behind the scene.This is precisely the reason why we have chosen to treat in three distinct levels what characterizes the role of a judge in a pending trial, choosing to treat both from a doctrinal and jurisp...

Ideally, I think, for every judge is that the problem of the dispute be a complicated one and with a relevant stake, so that you can hope that the parties will be represented by well-prepared and good-faith legal professionals. Why? Because, in such a case, on one hand, your research work is made easier, and on the other hand, at the end of the dispute, you have that feeling of accomplished duty, of finding the truth (not only the judi...

When you manage to get closer different fields, the outcome is exponentially more valuable that bigot loyalty to a single style. Keywords: judge, judicial decision, case-law, review. ...

Writing as a judge is a more recent activity for me. I am still during the period of reflection concerning many aspects of this profession, among which the clear, convincing and concise expression of the arguments on which a judgment is based represents a personal priority. I noted for a long time the opacity of many written documents in the judicial world, in Romania and elsewhere. I also noted the differences in style between various ...