My main goal writing this article was to organize the possible rulings in a regular civil claim procedure against an undertaking which became subject to an insolvency procedure. In order to achieve my goal, I analyzed the nature of the judgments of stay and closing imposed by art. 75 paragraph 1 from Law no. 85/2014.I concluded that both stay, and closing, are part of the same automatic stay international principle, and not two in...

The amendments to the Insolvency Law brought by GEO 88/2018 destabilized this field and affected the very reason of the insolvency procedure transforming it from a purely collective procedure, into a procedure that allows the individual recovery of the receivables of the tax creditors through individual enforcements.The wave of enforcements initiated under this ordinance has entailed a series of practical problems and questions l...

The objective arbitrability of the cases in which the defendant is a company undergoing insolvency proceedings must be analyzed, on the one hand, from the perspective of the stay of proceedings provided by Article 75 of the Insolvency Law, and on the other hand, considering the scope of the bankruptcy judge’s jurisdiction, in conjunction with the interpretation given to Article 3 para. (1) of the EU Insolvency Regulation. Conclusions.